R-Multiples: Measure Trading Results on One Risk Scale
Last saved:

Executive Summary
- ✦One R is the initial monetary risk defined before entry.
- ✦Divide the net result by initial R to compare different trades.
- ✦Keep planned risk and actual loss separate when gaps or slippage occur.
- ✦Review distributions and expectancy across a meaningful sample.
Learning objective: convert trade outcomes into R-multiples so that results from different markets and position sizes can be compared on the same risk scale.
Profit in pounds or dollars does not reveal whether a trade was well managed. A £500 gain may be strong if only £200 was planned at risk, or poor if £2,000 was exposed. An R-multiple expresses the result relative to the trade's initial planned risk.
1. Define one R before entry
One R is the amount the trader expects to lose if the original invalidation is reached, including an allowance for normal costs where practical.
Initial R = entry-to-stop distance × position size
For a long trade entered at £25 with a stop at £24 and 300 shares, price risk is £1 per share and initial R is £300 before fees and slippage. Risk must be recorded before the trade; redefining it afterwards makes the comparison unreliable.
2. Convert the final result
R-multiple = net trade profit or loss ÷ initial R
If the trade earns £600 after costs, the outcome is +2R. If it loses £240, the outcome is -0.8R. A gap through the stop might create -1.4R, which usefully shows that actual risk exceeded the plan.
R does not require every trade to risk the same money. A £100-risk trade and a £500-risk trade can both be assessed as +1.5R. This makes strategy review less distorted by account growth or changing position size.
3. Use a series, not one trade
The value appears across a meaningful sample. Record wins, losses, scratches and costs in R. Then calculate:
- Average winning R
- Average losing R
- Win rate
- Expectancy in R per trade
- Largest loss and drawdown in R
A method can be profitable with a low win rate if winners are much larger than losses. It can also lose money with a high win rate if occasional losses are uncontrolled.
4. Keep planned and actual R separate
Initial R measures the planned risk. Actual loss may differ because of slippage, gaps, partial exits or discretionary changes. Keep both fields. If losses repeatedly exceed -1R, investigate execution, liquidity, event exposure or failure to follow stops.
Do not move a stop farther away and call the new distance “one R”. That hides a rule break. The original risk unit must remain fixed for performance analysis.
Worked example
Assume five trades produce these net results:
- Trade 1: +2.0R
- Trade 2: -1.0R
- Trade 3: +0.5R
- Trade 4: -0.8R
- Trade 5: +1.3R
Total result is +2.0R across five trades, or +0.4R per trade. The win rate is 60%, but the more useful finding is the positive average result after losses.
If each trade had a different monetary risk, adding cash profits alone could misrepresent the strategy. R-multiples preserve the relationship between outcome and intended exposure.
This five-trade sample is too small for a firm conclusion. It demonstrates the calculation, not evidence of a durable edge.
Common mistakes
- Calculating R from the stop after the trade instead of before entry.
- Ignoring fees, spreads and slippage.
- Treating every loss as exactly -1R when gaps caused a larger loss.
- Comparing strategies with very different holding periods without context.
- Judging skill from one large positive R outcome.
- Increasing monetary risk after wins while claiming the process is unchanged.
Practical checklist
- Was entry, invalidation and size defined before the trade?
- What was initial monetary risk including expected costs?
- What was the net realised result?
- What is the outcome divided by initial R?
- Did actual loss exceed the plan, and why?
- Is the sample large enough to review meaningfully?
- What are average win, average loss and expectancy in R?
- Are results separated by setup and market regime?
The Money Man view
R-multiples create a common language for reviewing execution and strategy. They do not make risk disappear and do not prove an edge from a small sample. We use initial R as a fixed audit unit, then examine distributions and rule breaches rather than celebrating one large winner.
Educational information only. This tutorial is AI-assisted and published by The Money Man. It is not personalised investment advice, a recommendation or a promise of returns. Trading can result in losses.